I read "past the first paragraph". And saw, as I said, some hyperbole but not a great deal and perhaps some misinformation, although that amounted more to the writer's opinions and conclusions based on facts. I don't fully agree with those conclusions and if you have come to different conclusions- based on facts presented- simply say so- those are your opinions. But instead, you attack the author and call it hyperbolic misinformation. Ah. the nuances of making oneself clear without insulting others are lost on you.

You "silly, silly, silly, boy". Note the corrected use of punctuation? No? How sad for you. Is that statement hyperbole or fact or simply my conclusion based on the insulting words you've written in response to me and the writer? Are you not a bit arrogant to believe you know the minds of anyone who applauded your opinion/satire? Perhaps they simply enjoy insulting others... But who's to say? No one knows, other than you, master mind reader.

Ah. the price of self-absorption you live with, while having no knowledge of it

. It truly saddens me...