“How” is actually quite simple: those states weren’t expected to go to Joe, the first 2 being far less diverse than the general electorate, the third being an outlier. And he’s won most, if not all, states since then. And guess who won the “industrial Midwest” yesterday by exceedingly large margins? Uh, that would be Joe…

And tRump can try to use Hunter Biden against Joe all he wants: only tRump’s supporters will believe it and they’re not going to vote for any Democrat anyway, so where’s the big ‘threat’ there?

And Joe can bring up truths rather than conspiracies among tRump’s own children. Nepotism. Ivanka obtaining 300+ new Patents in China while other (non-family) businesses were banned from doing the same. We’re in a silly “trade war” with China. Ivanka’s Chinese made products being exempted from the tariffs all other businesses are forced to suffer through. Don Jr.’s love of killing endangered species. the 355+ days tRump has spent at one of his own properties- roughly a third of his time in Office- at taxpayer expense at his own properties (which aren’t cheap) while lying about the costs he charges the Secret Service and more to stay on his properties, putting taxpayer money into his coffers.

I assume you watched the Primaries yesterday, of course. Still feel the same about electability? Many of the young people at Bernie’s rallies came for the bands and music and party atmosphere and because it was “cool” to support Bernie. The problem is that far fewer young people vote in Primaries and even fewer in elections than do older people.

You use a lot of links to back your argument and if I wasn’t at work now I’d used enough to rebut every argument you’ve attempted to make but I can’t do that at this time; maybe this evening.

Good Day, Sir.