CBD, of course! Why didn't I and my neurologist ever see that simple fact? And why was Charlotte's Law passed years ago (named that after a young girl who suffered horribly and died from complications of epilepsy that could have been treated if marijuana were available at the time)? Those children and adults suffering from epilepsy, chronic pain, including from cancer and chemotherapy should just keep suffering, right? Try chemotherapy and your mind will be changed after the severe nausea it causes- I've had cancer and know full well that smoking pot was a great relief; give it a shot yourself. I smoke pot and not to "get high"; it relieves pain and helps me get a full night's sleep. Don't call me a "loser"- oh, you just did. Project much?

I am epileptic and my neurologist told me more than once that if it were legal, he would write a prescription for any epileptic patient he treated. CBD oil was and is available but NOT effective in treating. suffering from cancer and pain from other diseases, doesn't calm one enough to get a good night's sleep, and lacks the many other health benefits THC provides.

But you are arrogant enough to claim greater knowledge than neurologists- just which medical school did you attend for eight years?

You simply write a nonsense "article" without evidence beyond your own experience to get clicks and make money. Did smoking pot to get high is what damaged your brain and you want to project your own shortcomings on others?

The 'grown in volcanic soil' (just how much is?) was the first clue you don't know what you're talking about then you quote Ronald Reagan, the man who imported crack cocaine into the US on military transport planes to distribute in "certain (red: black) neighborhoods? I won't judge you as a person merely because you published such idiocy, though. Everyone's a fool at one time or another. Continue to be dishonest and write click bait headlines if that's the best you can do.